On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 07:40:53AM +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On Friday 24 Jan 2003 12:01 am, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 
> > > > Fproxy uses 256kB to 1MB chunks, but other clients could use other
> > > > sizes. That is however the recommended range for most uses.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Splitfiles therefore can fail if too many of the chunks are no longer
> > > > fetchable.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to use smaller chunks? Can you give me a link to a
> > > document that explains how to control the use of FEC via fproxy? For
> > > example, can I force the use of FEC for files smaller than 1 MB?
> >
> > No. Your application would not use Fproxy anyway, it would probably use
> > a library to talk directly to the node using FCP. What language are you
> > considering?
> 
> Perl for maintainance utilities and browser-side JavaScript for client-side 
> operation.
> 
> And yes, I know that JS will make the anonymity filter complain, but 
> ultimately, JS in browser is no more of an anonymity issue than any other way 
> to create Freenet application.
Hmm. Interesting. Have you considered writing it in java as a servlet?
Surely you do not want to make users have to click anonymity warnings every 
five seconds? :). Eventually, we will implement somse sort of server
side scripting... with a couple of limits it could be reasonably safe.
We might just allow some client-side stuff, but only "trusted recipes".
Help with this would be greatly appreciated :)
> 
> Once I have a prototype read-write implementation written in javascript, I 
> will probably port it to Perl DBI.
> 
> With the browser-based approach, fproxy is just about all I can do, as 
> everything has to be done using HTTP requests.
> 
> In the case of a Perl DBI library, there are more options, but the HTTP access 
> libraries are already there to make things a bit easier.
> 
> > > > You do know that Freenet is lossy, right? Content which is not accessed
> > > > very much will eventually expire.
> > >
> > > Yes, this is why I am thinking about using DBR. There would potentially
> > > be a number of nodes that would once per day retrieve the data, compact
> > > it into bigger files, and re-insert it for the next day. This would be
> > > equivalent to vacuum (PostgreSQL) and optimize (MySQL) commands.
> > >
> > > The daily operation data would involve inserting many small files (one
> > > file per record in a table, one file per delete flag, etc.)
> > >
> > > This would all be gathered, compacted, and re-inserted. Any indices would
> > > also get re-generated in the same way.
> >
> > Hmm. Interesting.
> 
> No idea if it will work, but I don't think there's any way to find out other 
> than write a prototype. :-)
> 
> > > > FEC divides the file into segments of up to 128 chunks (I think).
> > > > It then creates 64 check blocks for the 128 chunks (obviously fewer if
> > > > fewer original chunks), and inserts the lot, along with a file
> > > > specifying the CHKs of all the different chunks inserted for each
> > > > segment.
> > >
> > > Doesn't that mean that with maximum chunk size of 1 MB, this limits the
> > > file size to 128 MB? Or did I misunderstand the maximum chunk size, and
> > > it is purely a matter of caching as a factor of the store size?
> >
> > No. After 128MB, we use more than one segment. Within each segment, we
> > need any 128 of the 192 chunks to reconstruct the file.
> 
> Ah, OK, I understand now.
> 
> > > Is FEC fixed at 50% redundancy, or can the amount of redundancy be
> > > controlled (e.g. reduced to 25%, if requested)? Or has it been tried and
> > > tested that around 50% gives best results?
> >
> > Hmm. At the moment it is hard-coded. At some point we may change this.
> > The original libraries support other amounts.
> 
> OK.
> 
> Thank you for your help. I think I have a better idea of how to go about 
> writing my app now. :-)
> 
> Gordan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
> 

-- 
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full time freenet hacker.
http://freenetproject.org/
Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/eI49KUM9vEY/
ICTHUS.

Attachment: msg01063/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to