On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:15:57PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote: > "Nice. Another academic who takes Freenet seriously. (They are few and > far between, probably mostly because it's not provable...)" > > Well, you have me, and that's a big consolation! ;-) > > What I wanted to ask: is there still a big need for more testers for the 0.7 > pre-beta (or such ;-), how stable is it, does it clog up the line > (bandwith)? And how exactly is the plan for the public version? I mean, do > you intend to get the darnet-one completely done, before starting with the > other, or is it in parallel development?
Pre-alpha. On a typical day I will release several new mandatory builds, so in that sense it's not very stable, however, the basic functionality implemented so far *mostly* works. Darknet only is supported, but we will provide you with links if you want to help test. Bandwidth limiting is working, at 15kB/sec unless you specify otherwise. And yes we do need more testers; join #freenet-alphatest on irc.freenode.net. Right now I am working on improvements to logging, preparatory to testnet support. Finally, opennet will not be implemented until we have basic client functionality working on darknet, at least. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20051207/f4001c22/attachment.pgp>
