-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Apart from that... your argument is that you don't need global traffic > analysis to identify users, right? Well, probably this is true. You need > enough intelligence to see "hrrm, this user has VoIP connections to > these 5 other users 24x7... this doesn't seem very likely!". Right?
Right. For Freenet/dark to have any sort of obscurity (aka to be different from Freenet/light), its traffic patterns need to be plausible and acceptable. Freenet/dark will still use long lasting bidirectional sessions, moving lots of data, right? What, other than p2p filesharing, looks anything like that? =jr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTWkNWYfZ3rPnHH0RAiNpAJsG/m7iSgp3mQ37H9+YxkCJJDGXLwCfebZ+ dCBq/BurFx3DoRlABJF8zTg= =Mmxe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
