Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Only that it's slow (which can hopefully be significantly improved on by
> using FECFile for progressive decoding rather than doing it all at once
> at the end), and requires segments of 128*32k = 4MB. BTW is there a
> significant decoding speed gain from using less redundancy?

I don't know if any of the original whitepapers/benchmarks and so on were 
saved and available or not, but I'll ping a few of the openCOLA founders and 
see if I can get you some of the details.

-- 
Ken Snider

Reply via email to