On 4/16/06, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/15/06, Lars Juel Nielsen <lars.j.nielsen at gmail.com> wrote: > > That sounds like a quite bad idea if the small world theory and our > > routing algorithm works. > > At least according to my understanding of it. > > The alternative is that I drastically reduce the number of peerings I > have to improve the chances that my close-friends are able to stay > connected. ... but then I become part of a small subgraph myself and > become more likely a victim of partitioning. > > There isn't much point to the darknet model if we must force people to > peer promiscuously in order to maintain global connectivity. >
Promiscuous peering may not be the best think in relating to getting the routing protocol working optimally.
