Hmm, not good.. could you keep us informed of the results of the thread?
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:13:02AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > This thread on p2p-hackers might be of interest... > > Alex Pankratov wrote: > > We've recently added UPnP support to our client software and > > now I got some server-side stats and they are most interesting. > > > > Check this out - > > > > Roughly a half of all clients that reported success talking to > > their 'routers' and establishing TCP/UDP port mappings were > > still inaccessible from an outside via their mapped ports. > > > > Our UPnP code is written from scratch, so if the client says that > > ports are mapped, there was in fact a 200 response for respective > > SOAP request from the router. > > > > I was expecting some degree of failures due to double NAT'ing, > > additional firewalling, etc .. but 50% ? > > > > Anyone care to comment or compare this to their own numbers ? > > > > Alex -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060426/fb4ecc3e/attachment.pgp>
