On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:31:00PM +0000, NextGen$ wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2006-04-26 13:26:33]: > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:19:23AM +0000, NextGen$ wrote: > > > > > > imho Up&p and stun are useless without multi-homming support. > > > > Huh? What exactly do you think is necessary prior to STUN/UP&P? > > Having references with multiple contact points (an "official" signed > reference with possibly several addresses and an unofficial one with ip > gathered from up&p, other peers, last known, ...)... And maybe the > possibility within the node to have different listeners bound to different > sockets.
We already have the possibility of multiple IPs in the ref, and a separate last-detected IP. The IP detected from other peers is just used in the overall detection algorithm though; we will only publish one IP address at present, and we will only use one at a time to talk to a given node. I'm not sure exactly what you are suggesting we need. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060426/b04239a8/attachment.pgp>
