On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:51:06PM +0200, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: > On Tuesday 22 August 2006 17:55, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Two of the factors are ping time (700-1500ms we reject some more than > > that we reject all) and bwlimit delay time (1000-2000ms but I think > > there is a problem with the limiter). The objective here is to prevent > > timeouts; timeouts are *bad*. > > Couldn't we simply measure the time it takes us to process an incoming > packet, i.e. the time spent between receiving of the packet and having > sent out the response packet?
That only measures CPU usage. We want to detect network overload too. > > David -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060822/a58eb4e5/attachment.pgp>
