Matthew Toseland wrote: >>2. The whole idea of parameter names and types through a method strikes >>me as a property map. If what we're aiming for is a property map, this >>abstract class seems to be a property map of the heavily over-engineered >>variety. Might as well use java.util.Map and save yourself a forest of >>classes. > > Umm, they have callbacks...
So you're basically reinventing JavaBeans? Patrick
