* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2006-05-03 17:06:03]:

> How many SoC projects can we realistically mentor? We have 7
> applications at present, and have set our target to 3. One of the
> applications is sufficiently whacky that I will need to read several
> papers on his site in order to evaluate it; all the others would be
> useful.
> 
> Ian, will you be available over the summer to mentor people? Many people
> can assist students, even if they themselves are working for us under
> SoC; what you can't do is VOTE on proposals and also be a submitter of
> proposals.

It's not clear : previous statements from google, including the FAQ now
say that it's not possible :/ that we should 'focus' on either beeing a
mentor OR a student.

> I should be here for the vast majority of the summer,
> although there will definitely be shortish periods when I am not
> available at all.
> 
> IMHO:
> - The FUQID replacement is important.

see below

> - The search engine is moderately useful.
> - JFKi is moderately useful.
> - Load balancing/limiting simulations and implementation is very
>   important. Our current algorithm *mostly* works, but opens up a new
>   class of attacks on direct peers, which probably will not be mitigated
>   sufficiently by premix routing.

I don't think it matches the "self-contained" requirement :) Moreover,
it involves a fair bit of understanding of how freenet works and possibly
the black magic behind the routing... Not a SoC project imho.

> - Local messaging and file sharing is useful.

Eternal debate : do we want to link freenet with tools possibly
incitating to do copyright infringment ? Even if we don't bundle it,
shall freenet be the mentoring organization of such a project ?
btw, according to Bombe, Freemule is on the road ^-^

> - STUN and UP&P is useful.

I'm not convinced :)

> - The ant routing proposal; I have no idea, need to investigate his
>   site.

we can't see proposals ^-^ maybe we should incitate people to cross post
their applications on @tech ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060503/434d67fc/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to