-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 8 May 2006, at 12:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:16:42PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: >> >> On 8 May 2006, at 11:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> Okay, so this is more in the area of FreeMule? Certainly yet another >>> queue manager isn't that interesting, because they don't have to do >>> that >>> much work in 0.7. >>> >>> I think it's interesting... One possible problem is it's quite >>> close to >>> traditional filesharing. >> >> I don't think this is a problem provided that the tool isn't >> specifically designed for the sharing of copyrighted material, and >> that it doesn't include functionality that is specifically intended >> for this purpose. There are many valid uses for file sharing >> applications that don't involve copyright infringement. > > Likewise with the filesharing-with-immediate-darknet-peers thing then? Well, yes, but I really don't see the point in filesharing with immediate darknet peers from the perspective of Freenet's goals. Ian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEX5rzQtgxRWSmsqwRAo9zAJsE3UZuuvNTigkwv2+q3G+SMqZK3gCfanN0 vQlJjP/0Kgr4TvO0LwYC32A= =4MHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
