Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 17:31 schrieb toad: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 12:53:03PM +0100, bo-le at web.de wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 02:48 schrieb toad: > > > No, I'm not sure exactly what needs to be done. > > > > my wish: > > > > An option in freenat.ini, in order to prevent the client to read the DSA > > private keys. No matter, what the WithPrivate= in the GetNode command > > says. (always false) > > > > im sharing my FCP port with a friend since a long time, but give him > > access to the node private key is to much love!!! > > How do you share it with him? Does he have a different IP address?
dail in (phone line) + vmware server. jes. > > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:26:22PM +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > > > > Not urgent, but nobody told me about this ticket so I assumed from > > > > toads words that he is not willing to address this issue at all. > > > > Sorry if I was wrong with that... > > > > > > > > On 11/1/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) > > > > <nextgens at freenetproject.org> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >* bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com> [2006-11-01 22:41:59]: > > > > >> This sounds as if you are not willing to implement easy to use and > > > > >> easy to understand stuff into the node. > > > > >> You say that the client must handle it, you do not want to do > > > > >> anything > > > > > > > > > >for > > > > > > > > > >> it. > > > > >> What about clients that just do not provide a password prompt? > > > > >> What to do for the paranoid people? Nothing? > > > > >> > > > > >> Please, implement some of this things into the node rather than to > > > > >> shift all the work to the clients. They could fail, and this would > > > > >> compromise the anonymity of the (unsuspecting) user. If the node > > > > >> implements it there much lesser ways for the user to fail. > > > > >> > > > > >> And regarding dda: if the user tells the node to not to use dda > > > > >> then the node should do it. Even if you say it saves so much disk > > > > >> space. If the user is aware of this disable it. > > > > > > > > > >There are already tickets on mantis for that IIRC ... do it yourself > > > > > if you think it's urgent ;) > > > > > > > > > >> On 11/1/06, toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > > > >> >On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:26:03PM +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> On 11/1/06, toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > > > >> >> >On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:04:43PM +0100, > > > > >> >> > bbackde at googlemail.com > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > >> >> >> A user can run clients in a VM or on another box for exactly > > > > >> >> >> this reason (some users do this right now). This way bad > > > > >> >> >> clients cannot read more files than their own, and they > > > > >> >> >> cannot read node config files. The only way to do bad things > > > > >> >> >> is the FCP2 interface. And > > > > > > > > > >their > > > > [cut] > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > >Tech mailing list > > > > >Tech at freenetproject.org > > > > >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Tech mailing list > > > > Tech at freenetproject.org > > > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > > > > -- > > Mfg > > saces > > _______________________________________________ > > Tech mailing list > > Tech at freenetproject.org > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech -- Mfg saces
