On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 12:19:16PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 11:23, Michael Rogers wrote: > > Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > Throtting alone seems to work better though. I wonder if we should > > > disable the > > > backoff logic and see what happens. If we trust your simulations, we > > > should not > > > see much of a difference at all. > > > > I haven't had a chance to investigate heterogeneous capacity yet - > > backoff might be useful for avoiding unusually slow nodes without > > throttling the whole network to the speed of the slowest nodes. > > I think the above question is a very very important one. The other > aspect of it is how does non symmetric bandwidth affect the network? > eg. if we are basing send rates on average recieve rates from nodes > with much less output bw than input we may be wasting lots of bw... > What would happen if we only sent to one peer at a time (queueing > other messages) or what would happen if we used peek recieve > rates instead of average?
Not sure I understand what you are suggesting. > > Thanks > Ed > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061127/b5a7233c/attachment.pgp>
