On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:01:07PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > toad wrote: > >They probably don't constitute the majority of traffic. Forwarded > >requests use just as much bandwidth, on the rare occasion that they are > >successful, and successful forwarded requests are almost by definition > >more common than local hits. > > Ah sorry, I was interpreting 'hits' to mean all successful requests, not > just local ones. > > >That has been implemented. Simulations would be welcome eventually. > > On my list. :-)
Writing up the mid-layer changes we discussed - peer level congestion control etc - would also be nice. I don't think it makes much sense to implement the low level changes and the mid level changes separately. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061128/a7f70b53/attachment.pgp>
