On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:26:35AM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > PageRank is patented, and picking a fight with Google is a bad idea > > especially as they gave us 4 summer coders and $2000 last year. > > Sorry, did I say PageRank? I meant eigenvector centrality. :-) See the > related work section of this paper by Jon Kleinberg (who else?) - it > turns out people have been calculating eigenvector centrality in social > networks since at least the 70s and possibly the 50s: > > http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf > > I agree that it would be stupid (and ungrateful) to antagonise Google, > but there seems to be plenty of prior art for using eigenvector > centrality as a trust metric. I'll try to chase up the Katz, Hubbell and > Pinski-Narin refs tonight.
Cool! > > > However I do worry that once we have opennet nobody will use darknet. :| > > Agreed. Which may be a reason for only implementing premix routing on darknet. If people want Tor they can use Tor. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070207/1dd97f50/attachment.pgp>
