On Wednesday 09 April 2008 17:13, Michael Rogers wrote: > I've recently done some simulations of LRU vs FIFO vs random replacement, > but I haven't had time to write up the results yet. The short version is > that random replacement performs better than LRU or FIFO for some > workloads, and isn't significantly worse for any workload. I didn't > simulate multi-block files or FEC, though.
Any ideas why? Did you simulate a two layer store, a plain cache, or a plain store? > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080409/b899df56/attachment.pgp>
