On Friday 05 December 2008 15:19, Daniel Cheng wrote: > 2008/12/5 Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org>: > > When we implement sharing of datastore Bloom filters, we can make it work on > > opennet (for less paranoid users): > > The datastore bloom filter is salted ... do we want to share the salt?
That would seem to be the obvious solution, although not the best performing... > > > - Send diffs every hour. > > - Keep the diffs for a period. > > - Keep a list of old opennet nodes, including their bloom filters. This would > > be separate from the old-opennet-nodes mechanism, which I have proposed on > > devl to reform: it would just be an LRU of the last N nodes we've connected > > to via opennet, even if we dropped them because they were at the bottom of > > the LRU. > > - When we connect to an opennet node, if we have their bloom filter already, > > we could just ask for the cumulative diffs. > > > > Since most of the network is likely to be opennet for the foreseeable future, > > this could make a big difference, assuming we have tunnels as well... > > (paranoid users should use darknet!). > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tech mailing list > > Tech at freenetproject.org > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20081205/cfc7190f/attachment.pgp>
