Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> My wishlist for FCP3:
>>
>> * node generated message IDs to ensure true uniqeness and unguessability 
>> of node-IDs to protect different FCP client from another
>>     
>
> If the client wants to store an ID. What if it doesn't? More complexity for 
> little gain.
>   

The client has to store something in any case. If it has an ID, it can 
build everything depending on it alone. If it generated the ID by itself 
or is given the IDs by an authority (the node) is actually 
implementation-wise the same. But if the node gives the IDs the node can 
ensure the ID is of valid format (no esoteric characters) and it is 
actually easier for the client programmer as he does not have to care 
how to create IDs, does not have to check for uniqueness himself, etc. 
Just send a message to the node "hey, give me a new ID" and store it.
>> * usage of JSON [1] for the messages. This is standardized and easily 
>> parseable. Another *great* feat is it's easy to convert a JSON-message 
>> into a Java bean and vice versa [2], skipping the whole manual parsing 
>> of fields altogether and concentrating on the work to do.
>>     
>
> If it's java-specific it's useless, you can always steal the code you need 
> from Fred (as jSite does).
>   
 From the site (I suppose you read it before denying it ;) :
"JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange 
format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines 
to parse and generate. [...] JSON is a text format that is completely 
language independent but uses conventions that are familiar to 
programmers of the C-family of languages, including C, C++, C#, Java, 
JavaScript, Perl, Python, and many others. These properties make JSON an 
ideal data-interchange language."

This, actually, makes it ****very**** valuable for our 3rd party 
programmers and library developers as they don't have to create a 
message parse at all (just the semantic and logic, but this a library 
can never provide).
For nearly every language out there does a JSON-library exist that makes 
message creation, parsing and handling very easy.

- Languages that have a JSON-library (from the homepage, there will be 
even more!):
ASP, ActionScript, C, C++, C#, ColdFusion, D, Delphi, E, Erland, 
Haskell, haXe, Java, JavaScript, Lasso, Lisp, LotusScript, Lua, 
Objective C, Objective CAML, OpenLasso, Perl, PHP, Pike, pl/sqp, 
PowerShell, Prolog, Python, R, REALBasic, Rebol, Ruby, Squeak, Tcl.

Every of these has at least one implementation of a JSON-library. To sum 
the major languages up:
- C: 5
- C++: 6
- C#: 8
- Delphi: 3
- Java: 17
- PHP: 8
- Python: 6

>> If requested, I can provide elaborate snippets how to use the beanifying.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON
>> http://json.org/ (notice all the JSON-libraries freely available)
>>
>> [2]
>> http://json-lib.sourceforge.net/index.html (there are more)
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tech mailing list
>> Tech at freenetproject.org
>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to