2009/1/5 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i <3buib3s50i at gmail.com>: > The exchange of USB keys seems very far from the initial project of > Freenet... Too slow, not anonymous. TrueCrypt is a better choice in this > case!
USB keys should be no less anonymous than darknet freenet is normally: You know who your neighbors are in the network, but not further, and you don't know who a request came from. It may even be more anonymous than normal freenet because the batching would create bigger 'mixes' and some kinds of timing attacks may become impossible. You have it a bit backward: Truecrypt would have zero anonymity and it would not really be a 'network' without a lot of manual labor. ... though I suspect a "batch-mode" for freenet might ultimately find more utility for opportunistic exchanges with ad-hoc wireless.
