I am not personally interested by this feature, and I think it's not a good feature. So I don't post on the bugtracker. I post here to discuss on this request. If it doesn't interest you, I stop transfer, and I discuss on FMS, with interested people. This feature is dangerous if the freesite author is forced to censor his freesite.
On 1/27/09, Florent Daigniere <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 11:00, Florent Daigniere wrote: >>> 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >>>> md at BngcNVtC0qdeg2HmgSSs8jHVbYAomT8nQ0Pvx1NQ0Ks wrote: >>>>> How do I delete a freesite? I changed the name but I don't know how to >>>>> delete the "old" version. >>>> saces at foqoipX8V3aio7B~tNoxFmRutrcVHixhlAXB2WpFoeU wrote: >>>>> delete is an importand feature for censorship, so such operation does >>>>> not >> exist in freenet. >>>> falafel at IxVqeqM0LyYdTmYAf5z49SJZUxr7NtQkOqVYG0hvITw wrote: >>>>> This raises an interesting question: >>>>> >>>>> On the regular internet, you have HTTP error codes to indicate >>>>> different >>>>> statuses of freesites: >>>>> >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes >>>>> >>>>> In particular: >>>>> >>>>> 301 Moved Permanently >>>>> This and all future requests should be directed to the given URI. >>>>> >>>>> I think Freenet needs to provide a way for a freesite to trigger FProxy >>>>> to send a 301 redirect to the browser, and also a corresponding >>>>> redirect >>>>> in FCP. >>>>> >>>>> It confuses things somewhat that FProxy talks to the node using some >>>>> hidden internal protocol - I think it should be more separate from the >>>>> node and use FCP to communicate with the node. >>>>> >>>>> In particular, we want freesite spiders and indexing engines to know >>>>> that >>>>> the old site is dead and to include the new URL instead. When we get >>>>> clever about it, it can be used to retain the original site's ranking >> too. >>>>> How could such a thing be done? >>>>> >>>>> What if you just reinsert the site as a redirect to the new freenet >>>>> URI? >>>>> This would appear in FCP to be distinct from a mere redirect to a newer >>>>> version of the same key. >>>>> >>>>> Does that make FProxy send a 301 redirect message to the browser? >>> The Tech mailing list is the place where we discuss long-term, freenet >>> related issues; Not the place where users are expected to make feature >>> requests. >>> >>> Please stop it. >> >> You'd rather they made them on devl? > > On the bug tracker, under the "enhancement" or "feature request" > category... or using Ian's uservoice thingy. > > NextGen$ > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > -- 3buib3s50i at gmail.com | dimonqmfcb at gmx.com
