On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Toseland < toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009 16:42:55 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > djk at isFiaD04zgAgnrEC5XJt1i4IE7AkNPqhBG5bONi6Yks wrote : > > > http://www.gnu.org/software/freetalk/ > > Every reasonably interesting name is already in use. :| > > Suggestions for renaming Freetalk are welcome as far as I am concerned. > We should stick with "Freetalk" unless someone comes up with a clearly better name that isn't taken. The "freetalk" software you mention is not high-profile, and I think we are placing an excessive restriction on ourselves if we must find an absolutely unique name - we'll end up having to call it something like "f745jhgf!!&p". Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20090526/c12369be/attachment.html>
