On Tuesday 20 July 2010 18:35:24 Michael Rogers wrote: > On 19/07/10 21:55, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > The fundamental problem has always been spam: These are effectively KSKs, > > and when you fetch them you propagate all the spam that the spammer has > > inserted. > > > > So solve it the same way we solve this for chat. All we have to do to make > > FASD feasible is: > > - Make the items signed. > > - Send a compressed list of the inserter identities we are interested in > > along with the request. > > Maybe we could do something even simpler than that. Each indexer > publishes her index in the form USK at blah,blah/index/123/keyword. > Retrieve only the keywords you're interested in, from only the indexers > you trust.
That's what we do now. It doesn't scale. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20100728/ce4716c4/attachment.pgp>
