$brand-new-job uses ReviewBoard [1]; it seems nice so far, although I've posted all of one change. Per [2] they support both git and svn.
- Adam Compton [1] http://www.reviewboard.org/ [2] http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/management/repositories/#repositories On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Charles Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Christian Paredes wrote: >> > Does anyone happen to use a code review web tool for their team? >> > Which one do you guys use? If not, I'm wondering if anyone's got any >> > insight on which tool might be best for handling both git and svn >> > repositories? >> >> > At previous $jobs, we used "svnspam" which emailed a colorized, > syntax-highlighted diff of code check-ins to the dev team. This let the > other devs quickly peruse submissions, and sometimes notice bugs or make > optimization suggestions to fellow devs. > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ > >
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
