On Nov 15, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Mark McCullough wrote: > I'd say you should decide which is your real goal. The two issues call for > very different toolsets.
You would think ;-) The current admins have it in place, swear it has saved their butt a few times and don't want to lose it. But they are unable to define what it is they want :( Which means I can probably argue one way or another possibly ;-) > Too easy to alter the log invisibly without any evidence of such left on the > local system. Ah, we're syslogging to a closed system so that's not the issue. > I admit, my experience with rootsh is four years old. But we'd been using it > for many years before then and were never happy with it. We just didn't have > any better option then. What do you consider a better option now? -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
