Yes, the executives use it (it is used to implement our "intranet" site as well as various research topic webs.) We do have the WYSIWYG editor turned on in our current TWiki site, but they don't like how it works.
We could/should kick tires on the latest version of SharePoint Foundation (we really should at least upgrade our current SharePoint site) but I've got some feedback that it's not "all that". Also, we definitely are not a 100% MSFT shop (that said, we aren't a 100% anything shop :) - Will On Sep 26, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Tom Limoncelli wrote: > Modern versions of Twiki have WYSIWYG editors. I'm not sure about > drag-and-drop. A call to their pre-sales people would answer those > questions. Commercial support might calm the fears of the executives. > > Do the executives actually use the Twiki or are their concerns about > other users not being as productive as they could be? > > To be honest, for all the negative things I hear about Sharepoint, I > also hear that if you are a 100% MS shop it is awesome for the users > that are used to the walled garden that MS mades. Nothing wrong with > that, IMHO. If you are concerned with having to maintain it, I'm told > that MS's hosted version of Sharepoint is pretty reasonable. One > thing I like about hosted solutions is that it makes executives really > really see the cost of something. They literally do not know what > value to put on the work that you do. Suddenly being told that a > hosted solution is $xx/month per user makes them realize what a > bargain in-house IT is. (I'm also told "Microsoft's Office 365 is > basically hosted Sharepoint".) > > Tom > _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
