On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Without checking the internet, and before you listen to other peoples' > anecdotes or anything, I'd like to hear your gut feel, I want to know what > your natural instinct is. What do you think about the reliability of the > following tools? > And you go on to list what appears to be backup tools. If I'm setting up backups, reliability of the tool /per se/ is only part of the story. It may well have worked reliably for someone's intended purpose; but that purpose may not align with mine. So even if it's "absolutely reliable", I still want to test it in *my* environment with *my* workload instead of assuming it's automatically suitable for *my* needs. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
