On 05/16/2014 08:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote: >> From: David Lang [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Well, you are making quite an assumption when you say that what they are >> doing >> is correct and that the only way to do anything going forward is to munge >> things >> to work with Yahoo > > As I said in OP, and in fact, you quoted in your reply: > Before anybody says "Don't use yahoo," this is both a reasonable thing for > yahoo to do, and something that others can and should and will (like it or > not) be adopting more in the future. > > Point is, *today* it might be just yahoo and security activists. But it's > only a matter of time before it's other big boys too. > > Have you looked into who's behind creating DMARC? AOL, Google, Microsoft, > Yahoo, Facebook, Comcast, and others. >
I'm personally still undecided on what I think about Yahoo's DMARC record change. But the mailop list has been discussing this change for weeks now, and it's been very clear from that discussion that your statement "this is both a reasonable thing for yahoo to do, and something that others can and should and will be adopting more in the future" is far from universally agreed upon. (Nor is how to best respond or react to the Yahoo change.) -- Hello World. David Bronder - Systems Architect Segmentation Fault ITS-EI, Univ. of Iowa Core dumped, disk trashed, quota filled, soda warm. [email protected] _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
