Well, here's another take on the situation, usually high quality info, but no strong conclusions.
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/true-goodbye-using-truecrypt-is-not-secure/ I'm tempted to go with the NSL+projectshutdown(type=LavaBit) --tep On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) <lop...@nedharvey.com> wrote: > Sorry for violating my own gag request. But the longer it remains unchanged, > the more probable it seems it really was intentional, and not a hoax or a > hack. > > I have a new speculation: > > They were told to remove the hidden volume capability. They would rather > commit suicide. They were told not to go public with the coercion attempt as > lavabit did. So they posted ridiculous bullshit on their webpage, signed it > to demonstrate it's legitimately them, and the public is left to speculate > what happened. > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech@lists.lopsa.org > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
