This sounds like perhaps a bad NAT instance inside VPC?

--
~*~ StormeRider ~*~

"Every world needs its heroes [...] They inspire us to be better than we
are. And they protect from the darkness that's just around the corner."

(from Smallville Season 6x1: "Zod")

On why I hate the phrase "that's so lame"... http://bit.ly/Ps3uSS

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Phil Pennock <lopsa-t...@spodhuis.org>
wrote:

> On 2014-10-06 at 10:41 -0600, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> > A Linux instance becomes unreachable via ssh from some ip addresses. If
> you
> > try to ssh from those addresses, it just hangs, for ever, until to
> ctrl-c out
> > of it. Yet you can ssh from other ip addresses without any problem.
> >
> > The ip addresses that work and that don't seem random, some are outside
> AWS,
> > some inside, even on the same subnet. When we run in DEBUG3 mode, we see
> that
> > the client sent it's key, while the server waits for the said key, and
> sits
> > there waiting. The few similar issues (ssh hanging at key exchange) we
> found
> > when googling were solved by changing MTU!
>
> Sounds perfectly reasonable.
>
> You have a virtualized network; with large-scale clustered switches, the
> path between two hosts on the "same" network can vary based upon source
> and destination IPs.  One misconfigured switch (or bad link) ends up
> only affecting those paths: you no longer have a host being "on the
> network" or "not on the network".
>
> With a broken path and something dropping ICMP fragmentation needed
> packets, you lose packets which exceed the path MTU.  If you want to
> work reliably, revisit the broken firewalls and packet filters, to let
> Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) work.
>
> So: virtualized network, and something filtering out ICMP packets which
> it shouldn't be, between the source and destination hosts, so all TCP
> flows between them break as soon as you try to send too large a packet.
> As soon as someone has a Ridiculously Large Key the "too large" happens
> when signing/sending the pubkey offer from the client to the server.
>
> Regards,
> -Phil
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech@lists.lopsa.org
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>  http://lopsa.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to