> From: Phil Pennock [mailto:lopsa-t...@spodhuis.org]
> 
> If you want to build manually, then snapshot: Docker
> can be used in vmware or virtualbox or AWS or whatever: Packer

Thanks, I'm going to look at Docker and Packer too.  So far, Ansible or Nothing 
seem to be the most comfortable fits.  Blueprint maybe too - the only problem 
is - and maybe this is solvable - Blueprint is way more verbose than needed.  I 
don't see any easy way to inspect the contents of a blueprint and modify for a 
similar but different system.  And it includes boat loads of stuff that's not 
strictly necessary - If you have a base Centos installation, and you "sudo yum 
-y groupinstall base" then you get a decent baseline system, including selinux, 
but I observed the contents of the Blueprint included snapshots of all the 
selinux policies, which should not be necessary.  Ideally, after a minimal 
centos install and yum groupinstall base, the "blueprint" should be just 
"Centos Minimal, and yum groupinstall base."  Instead, it's a massive data 
structure...


> It's just that we've moved from a world where machines are set up rarely
> and repetitive tasks are scripts you write for users on those machines,
> to a world where "machines" should be spun up in at most minutes, are
> spun up frequently, and the end-users normally don't have accounts on
> those machines.  So the focus of the sysadmin automation moves to

I don't really understand the use case of frequent spinning up machines - 
except in a few circumstances, such as to create a pristine QA environment for 
testing some development code.

The two specific tasks at hand that I want to improve are:  At one company, I 
inherited a single production server with boat loads of customized services on 
it.  Apache with lots of modifications to the config files and document roots 
etc, plus dependent packages php and zend, mysql, ldap, rsnapshot, etc 
installed.  Mysql I can handle easily enough.  Automating the installation of 
the LDAP data seems to be nearly impossible.  Even a manual one-time backup and 
clone to a new machine for development purposes is nearly impossible.  The idea 
that we can automate the build of a dev clone environment and expect that we'll 
just "reapply" the thoroughly tested dev procedure into production is ... 
Perhaps not infeasible, but nearly so.

The other specific task at hand is a drupal server.  Yes I think I can automate 
installation of system packages and hardening, setting of document root, 
deploying the drupal core and all the modules, and even restoration of the 
mysql database and populating the various data directories and setting 
permissions.  But then there's tons of details such as ... The mysql database 
is actually on a separate mechine.  Usernames are "username@IPAddress" or 
whatever.  Now in order to automate that, I'll have to automate the backup & 
restore of the database, and also automate the editing of all the mysql user 
credentials and firewall rules that only allow mysql connections from the 
specified IP addresses, and ....  You get the idea.

I don't understand how people expect this sort of setup to be repetitious, spun 
up frequently, or anything *other* than "do it by hand, one time, and document 
what you do as you go along."  Even when an Amazon machine crashes, and comes 
up with a different IP address, the formerly automated process of setting the 
mysql user credentials and firewall rules have now broken, because of a simple 
IP change.  Yes we have a documented procedure, copy & paste a dozen lines, to 
fix that when it occurs, but it seems like automating it would make it *more* 
work, not less.

Plus, you have to learn a new language?  Ruby and/or YAML, whatever...  Next 
time you hire somebody, this is a requirement to be on their resume...  There's 
something to be said for using lowest-common-denominator technologies because 
then you can hire *anybody* to do it.  It's very clear to me why the automating 
community perceives people like me resisting adoption - it's very clear that 
it's the clear right thing to do if you're managing a compute farm, or a bunch 
of identical systems, but I'm having a hard time coming to grips with the idea 
that automation should be used by everyone, or even, anything other than 
compute farms.

I don't have repetitive tasks that waste my time.  I only have the desire to 
migrate systems from Centos 6 to Centos 7, or from Amazon to Vmware, or 
whatever.  And the desire to confidently tell management, "Yes, even if all of 
AWS US East were to be submerged by a tsunami, I could restore services in a 
reasonable period of time."
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to