> From: tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org [mailto:tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org]
> On Behalf Of Josh Smift
> 
> ENH> All because your password gets sent to the company over the HTTPS
> ENH> connection. There is zero upside to sending the password, when there
> ENH> exist standard techniques to prove you know something without
> ENH> exposing the thing.
> 
> Unless I've misunderstood how this works, though, the "you" who gets to
> make this decision is the server, not the client. Like, there's nothing I
> as a client can do to choose to send one-time credentials rather than
> reusable ones, if the server doesn't support it, right?

As a client, you can choose to use services that don't require access to your 
password, encryption keys, or data. If you use services such as Dropbox, 
Google, etc, that require you to provide them access, you can inform them this 
is something you care about (maybe you can't actually reach Dropbox or Google, 
but others you can actually reach) and you can choose to switch to competing 
services that don't have that requirement.


> (So maybe what you mean here is "there's zero upside 

What I mean is, there is zero benefit and all downside, to exposing your 
password to any servers. All servers and services worldwide should adopt the 
new standard. Most services aren't there yet.


> to asking your
> customers to send reusable credentials"

There wasn't any mention of reusable credentials in this thread, but I know 
you're talking about reusing credentials because of the previous thread about 
"it should be ok to reuse passwords, as long as passwords aren't exposed to 
servers." But that's not a core focus - gaining the ability to reuse passwords 
is just a nice side-effect and isn't the main reason you should care - 
cybercriminals including hackers and bad employees are the reason you should 
care. Plus the erosion of any legal right to privacy. Privacy is not about 
keeping secrets, it's about choosing who you share your personal information 
with, choosing who's included in your communications. If you're a high profile 
person, or you belong to a persecuted minority, or you have some sort of 
controversial belief, you cannot feel safe if you don't know who's included in 
your communications. The right to privacy is necessary, if you want freedom of 
speech, freedom of religion, freedom of thought.
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to