lanning wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:04:59 +0200, Aleksandar Ivanisevic
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I had to lower down mtu to 1300 to make google work again. IPs not 
>> working all seem to be in or around the 74.125.39.0/24 netblock.
> 
> This seems like a Path MTU Discovery issue. (not specifically Google)
> 
> MTU is not known past your physical interface.

Packets of weird sizes then, call them what you want :)

> Try turning off Path MTU Discovery and putting your MTU back at 1488.
> (This is not really a solution, but a test.)
 > You can try pinging with larger and larger packet sizes to see what
 > router is dropping on the larger packet size, without returning an
 > ICMP.

This is what I always do first. The magic limit seems to lie exactly at 
1300 bytes.

[r...@proxy ~]# ping 74.125.39.100 -s 1272
PING 74.125.39.100 (74.125.39.100) 1272(1300) bytes of data.
1280 bytes from 74.125.39.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=39.4 ms
1280 bytes from 74.125.39.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=37.9 ms
1280 bytes from 74.125.39.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 time=42.6 ms

--- 74.125.39.100 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.986/40.051/42.686/1.960 ms


with pmtu discovery

[r...@proxy ~]# ping 74.125.39.100 -s 1273
PING 74.125.39.100 (74.125.39.100) 1273(1301) bytes of data.

--- 74.125.39.100 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 8009ms

anything over 1300 without pmtu disc gets truncated replies, so there is 
definitely something fishy there

[r...@proxy ~]# ping 74.125.39.100 -s 1273
PING 74.125.39.100 (74.125.39.100) 1273(1301) bytes of data.
1280 bytes from 74.125.39.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 (truncated)
1280 bytes from 74.125.39.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 (truncated)
1280 bytes from 74.125.39.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 (truncated)


_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to