> I do use resize2fs. The process is to grow the lun. Then you have to > delete and add in a new partition because the old partition will be > smaller than the size of the new lun. Then one the partition fills up > the lun, you run resize2fs to grow the file system.
I don't see the benefit of having a partition table. Why not just mke2fs the whole lun? Then, there's no need to edit a partition table to resize. You simply resize2fs, and it grows to the size of the lun. Obviously, this suggestion is no benefit here and now ... since you've already got a partition table ... only a retrospect comment. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
