In the clientless "webvpn" configuration, you can only access things that
are available in http form.  Such as http-to-cifs interface, and various
http published apps and so on.  But if you want to RDP to some machine, and
access CIFS natively from your client, or do anything under the sun . then
"webvpn" isn't good enough.

 

"webvpn" is a trimmed down version of vpn.  Pros and cons.  Pros are that
your clients can't broadcast a virus to the LAN and you have more control
over security and so on.  Cons are that you can't broadcast all the traffic
you want, and you're getting denied access to things you want.

 

So "webvpn" is not a true vpn.  It's just a web interface to various
services.

 

Unless you mean to talk about the "thin client" vpn . port tunneling and so
on?

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Christopher L. Butler
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:47 AM
To: Edward Ned Harvey; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [lopsa-tech] Cisco AnyConnect. Welcome death of the Old VPN

 

Thanks Edward, I'm curious though...

If you are routing everything over https, why not just use clientless SSL
(AKA Web VPN)?
It seems to encompass all the benefits you were referring to except you can
access it without any client instillation.

Thank you,
Chris Butler
Infoscitex Corporation
Systems Administrator
781/890-1338 x291
617/276-5099 (cell)




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Edward Ned Harvey
Sent: Thu 12/24/2009 10:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [lopsa-tech] Cisco AnyConnect.  Welcome death of the Old VPN

During the last 3 weeks, I learned something too.



Cisco AnyConnect VPN is replacing / has replaced the IPSec VPN client.  And
rightly so.  I currently have both the old and new vpn clients running and
connecting to my ASA.  So it's still compatible with the old client; I just
added some config to my ASA to enable the new client.  Here's what's
improved:

1.       Installation

a.       In the Old VPN client, users needed to pre-download the installer
from the LAN, along with the configuration files / preshared keys.

b.      In the AnyConnect client, the user doesn't need to download in
advance.  They just type in https://your-gateway and login with their
credentials, and download it from there.  After they use the webpage once,
the client is installed, and for later times they can just launch the client
directly.

2.       Configuration

a.       In the Old VPN client, you needed to configure firewall settings.

b.      In AnyConnect, no firewall changes are needed.

3.       Interruption

a.       In the Old VPN client, you needed to interrupt your network and
reboot during installation.

b.      In AnyConnect, not necessary.  As soon as you install it, it's
already running.

4.       Proxy Support

a.       In the Old VPN client, if you were visting some other company like
Intel or whatever . that blocks all access to the internet and requires the
use of their proxy server . You simply couldn't VPN in to your home network.

b.      In AnyConnect, it's tunneling across https, and it supports use of a
proxy server.  So now you can VPN back into your company even when you're
visiting some other company.

5.       Reconnection

a.       In the Old VPN client, if you get some packet loss, the connection
drops, and you have to reconnect.

b.      In AnyConnect, if the connection drops, it auto-reconnects.



And the license is dirt cheap.  $70 one-time, for 25 users.  "Cisco
AnyConnect Essentials."  Plus I pay $30/yr to godaddy for a SSL cert.



It works equally well on Windows, 32bit, 64bit, Linux, or Mac, Leopard and
Snow Leopard.



Long story short, the New VPN is the welcome death of the Old VPN.  ;-)  I
love this thing, support, deployment, and use.  It couldn't be easier, or
more powerful.  I see absolutely no way to improve upon this.  It's perfect.
;-)



If you have any concerns about network security . "Can my company catch a
virus from a home user's computer" etc . they make additional licenses and
configuration options to address that concern.  Details if anyone's curious,
just ask.





_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to