One thing that immediately comes to mind is it will be fsck'd every time it's not unmounted cleanly (as opposed to just having its journal replayed for ext3).
In practical terms though, I don't think it really matters that much, though personally I'd just put ext3 there too, because I don't think the difference will be noticeable. Dan On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Linux, if you split /tmp from the other filesystems, do you tend to make it > ext2 since it's only for temporary files, and speed is more important? > > What could be a drawback of doing that? > > -- > Yves. > gmail, jabber, LiveJournal, nimbuzz, ovi, dreamhost: xmpp:[email protected] > http://www.SollerS.ca/ > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ > _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
