I haven't used it in quite a while, but 3Par has excellent products that are often more cost effective than the options you listed, and I'm told are still some of the most performant systems on the market. If it's not too late in your process, you might research them as well.
On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Jefferson Cowart wrote: > We are currently looking at SAN/NAS options from Compellent, EMC (NS > Line), and NetApp (FAS3000 series). We'll be looking at a good size > chunk of CIFS/NFS file shares along with block level for VMware, > Exchange, SQL, Oracle, etc. I was hoping some of you have some > experience with one or more of these and would be willing to share your > thoughts. (Feel free to contact me directly off-list if you want.) One > of the big things I'm looking for is real world utilization rates. (I > have expected numbers from the vendors, but I'd be interested in > confirming them against real world deployments.) I'd also be > particularly interested if any of you have used multiple of these to > explain what you liked/disliked between them. Thanks in advance for any > information. > > -- > Thanks > Jefferson Cowart > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ Benjamin Krueger [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
