On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:30:13PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote:
> Or, rather, the following diff. But I'm not sure having to places
^^
two- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd invocation Ingo Schwarze
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd invocation Theo de Raadt
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd invoc... Jacob L. Leifman
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd i... Stuart Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd i... Philip Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd i... Otto Moerbeek
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd i... Han Boetes
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd i... Igor Sobrado
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd i... Marco Peereboom
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd invocation Pierre Riteau
- Re: [PATCH] bioctl(8): fix dd invocation Pierre Riteau
