On Friday 28 August 2009 08:37:06 Ed Schouten wrote: > * Ed Schouten <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Otto Moerbeek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I thought about this a long time. While I have sympathy for your > > > approach, I think it is not the right way in the end. When confronted > > > with a broken standard, the right way would be to fix the standard. > > > Providing an implementation that works around the broken parts is not > > > the answer, because it does not send a clear message to the standard > > > authors. > > > > Which is the reason why I submitted this issue to the folks at the > > Austin Group as well. > > And it got approved, which means future revisions of POSIX will allow > implementations similar to the one I proposed: > > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=96
You need a login / password to view that. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
