do the sb900 chipsets suffer the same bugs as the sb600 ones?
dlg
On 13/10/2009, at 11:00 AM, Brad wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 02:31:27PM -0400, Brad wrote:
The following diffs add support for IDE and SATA with the AMD SB900
chipset.
Here is an updated diff after the last commit to ahci(4).
Index: ahci.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/ahci.c,v
retrieving revision 1.150
diff -u -p -r1.150 ahci.c
--- ahci.c 13 Oct 2009 00:19:38 -0000 1.150
+++ ahci.c 13 Oct 2009 00:56:24 -0000
@@ -427,6 +427,9 @@ int ahci_nvidia_mcp_attach(struct ahci
struct pci_attach_args *);
static const struct ahci_device ahci_devices[] = {
+ { PCI_VENDOR_AMD, PCI_PRODUCT_AMD_SB900_SATA,
+ NULL, ahci_ati_sb600_attach },
+
{ PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_SB600_SATA,
NULL, ahci_ati_sb600_attach },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_SBX00_SATA_1,
Index: pciide.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pciide.c,v
retrieving revision 1.301
diff -u -p -r1.301 pciide.c
--- pciide.c 5 Oct 2009 20:39:26 -0000 1.301
+++ pciide.c 9 Oct 2009 23:22:46 -0000
@@ -560,6 +560,10 @@ const struct pciide_product_desc pciide_
{ PCI_PRODUCT_AMD_CS5536_IDE,
0,
amd756_chip_map
+ },
+ { PCI_PRODUCT_AMD_SB900_IDE,
+ 0,
+ ixp_chip_map
}
};
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
