On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:28:44AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jason McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:01:26PM +0000, Owain Ainsworth wrote: > >> > >> saying that no action is taken does imply that it is not an error. > >> -is 0, then action will be taken on the page that contains > >> +is 0, then no action will be taken on the page that contains > > > > personally i would be tempted to simplify this to: > > > > If > > .Fa len > > is 0, no action is taken... > > Agreed. If no action is taken, you don't need to specify where the > action doesn't happen. :)
oh, but i don;t mean to chop the sentence. rather to change from future passive (will be taken) to present (is), as i think it's easier for most folks to read. jmc
