On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:24:09PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> 
> Ok, with tweaks. I don't it is neccesary to repeat we are dealing with
> FFS, nor is the e.g. useful, imo. jmc, do you agree?
> 

yes, i'm fine with this latest diff.
jmc

>       -Otto
> 
> Index: fsck_ffs.8
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck_ffs.8,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -u -p -r1.21 fsck_ffs.8
> --- fsck_ffs.8        10 Jan 2010 10:53:33 -0000      1.21
> +++ fsck_ffs.8        3 Mar 2010 12:21:00 -0000
> @@ -195,6 +195,18 @@ which is assumed to be affirmative.
>  File systems will not be opened for writing.
>  This is the default for file systems to be checked that are
>  concurrently mounted writable.
> +.It Fl p
> +Enter preen mode:
> +.Nm
> +will check the filesystems on the
> +special (raw) devices listed on the command line
> +and will make minor repairs without
> +human intervention.
> +Any major problems will cause
> +.Nm
> +to exit with a non-zero exit code,
> +so as to alert any invoking program or script
> +that human intervention is required.
>  .It Fl y
>  Assume a
>  .Dq yes
> @@ -218,12 +230,6 @@ are being converted at once.
>  The format of a file system can be determined from the
>  first line of output from
>  .Xr dumpfs 8 .
> -.Pp
> -If no file systems are given to
> -.Nm
> -then a default list of file systems is read from
> -the file
> -.Pa /etc/fstab .
>  .Pp
>  Inconsistencies checked are as follows:
>  .Pp

Reply via email to