On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Philip Guenther <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's think about what you're proposing: "we added -o as an extension, > but now we want a *different* -o, so let's shuffle the extensions > (breaking anything using them) so that people can depend on a > different extension" This doesn't make sense to me.
Which set is bigger? The users/scripts using GNU grep that will in the future use OpenBSD, or the users/scripts currently using this option on OpenBSD? I guess we should introduce a scale factor for the set we care more about... :) > I'm opposed to this. Sorry, Ted. I had earlier claimed it was a 10 line diff, so it was just an exercise to see if I was right. I think counting new code only I got it pretty close. I'm not attached to the option or the diff. mu.
