It really is very simple -- If you get it
(a) build and then tested (b) then tell me what the growth to the media is then it can be commited. I am the custodian of the extremely size-sensitive install media... > if we are dropping bioctl then we might as well drop CRYPTO. You really > one with the other. > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:05:43PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:05:53 +0200 > > >> From: David Coppa <[email protected]> > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> This diff adds missing bits for softraid support into sparc/sparc64 > > >> ramdisks. > > >> > > >> Tested on my Blade 150, bsd.rd didn't overflow. > > >> > > >> Comments? OKs? > > > > > > For sparc64, I think we shouldn't add bioctl this to ramdisk/list and > > > ramdiskB/list. These are floppy images and space is a bit tight. > > > Besides, you didn't add CRYPTO to RAMDISKU1 and RAMDISKU5, so it > > > wouldn't be terribly useful anyway. > > > > I'll remove sbin/bioctl from ramdisk/list and ramdiskB/list > > > > > And you'll need to test the sparc bits (or drop them). > > > > Cannot test since i don't have a sparc machine available: so I'll drop > > these too. > > > > ok?
