On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:28:27PM +0100, Sam Smith wrote:
The CVS revision number is guaranteed atomically increasing
and only relevant if it's used as a tie breaker against two
otherwise similar versions.
there's probably an obvious reason why this is a bad idea.
Stable branches...
The tree is branched, so the commit numbers aren't
conflicting and you can also see where it branched from.
It makes the calculation logic a little less simple, but
still well defined as they're still atomically increasing.
Regards
Sam
--
Sanity: Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost
yours doesn't mean you can borrow mine.
