* Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> [2010-09-21 02:31]: > On 2010/09/20 11:10, Henning Brauer wrote: > > oh and when the snaplen is too small i > > don't do the rewrite and pass out the packet unmodified... not sure > > what else we could do but dropping, which would be inconsistent with > > other pcap stuff. > > oh that's wierd indeed. would it be totally insane to print both the > natted and original addresses? then it would be clear that it's been > truncated.
that's the next step ;) > > this touches the regular code patches (aka non-pflog) quite a bit too, > > there is some heavy code refactoring. watch you state tables > > carefully. > > i haven't hit anything nasty yet.. (v4 and a little bit of v6). > -- Henning Brauer, [email protected], [email protected] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
