On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:36:43PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote: > is there a reason why we don;t document FSTAB_RQ? Not one that I can think of. If this works as intended go ahead (it should).
> jmc > > Index: fstab.5 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/fstab.5,v > retrieving revision 1.42 > diff -u -r1.42 fstab.5 > --- fstab.5 8 Jun 2009 17:03:15 -0000 1.42 > +++ fstab.5 23 Sep 2010 17:36:53 -0000 > @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ > If > .Fa fs_type > is > -.Dq rw > +.Dq rw , > +.Dq rq , > or > .Dq ro > then the filesystem whose name is given in the > @@ -243,7 +244,8 @@ > .Xr fsck 8 > will assume that the filesystem does not need to be checked. > .Bd -literal > -#define FSTAB_RW "rw" /* read-write device */ > +#define FSTAB_RW "rw" /* read/write device */ > +#define FSTAB_RQ "rq" /* read/write with quotas * > #define FSTAB_RO "ro" /* read-only device */ > #define FSTAB_SW "sw" /* swap device */ > #define FSTAB_XX "xx" /* ignore totally */ > @@ -253,7 +255,7 @@ > char *fs_file; /* filesystem path prefix */ > char *fs_vfstype; /* type of filesystem */ > char *fs_mntops; /* comma separated mount options */ > - char *fs_type; /* rw, ro, sw, or xx */ > + char *fs_type; /* rw, rq, ro, sw, or xx */ > int fs_freq; /* dump frequency, in days */ > int fs_passno; /* pass number on parallel fsck */ > };
