On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Maurizio Boriani wrote: > I've successfully parsed a cvs repo of about 196000 files and obtained the > same (good) result with old opencvs, patched opencvs and gnu cvs
Thank you for testing, good feedback is even better than bugreports. :) I have improved rcsparse.c in some more areas: - comment @@; and expand @@; are optional, set it to OPTIONAL. - added dummy support for commitid ...;, reported by Joerg Sonnenberger for OpenCVS and it was in for OpenRCS already. - rewrote switch() into more readable if() statement. - plugged a memory leak - adjusted some comments And best part: - generalized rcsparse enough to get it into OpenRCS and OpenCVS with only two lines diff (cvs_vlog instead of vwarnx and its include)! Our trees (ports, src, www, xenocara) work fine as of today, 10:00 o'clock. I don't want to put these two diffs (57K/~2500 lines each) in this mail, please download here: http://www.stoeckmann.org/opencvs-rcsparse.diff http://www.stoeckmann.org/openrcs-rcsparse.diff You can also download an OpenCVS export of mine. I have used it to identify any possible differences between current and new parser. It parses a supplied RCS file fully with current and new parser and compares the data structures in memory. If you see ANY output, PLEASE send me the RCS file! Usage: opencvs /path/to/RCS/file,v http://www.stoeckmann.org/cvs.tar.gz With kind regards, Tobias Stoeckmann
