On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:06 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > This diff was made by oga@ some time ago -- I just fixed a few conflicts > > and I would really like to see this going in. > > > > netisr needs to be made a normal C function and not this madness it > > currently is. This is necessary to imporve the packet scheduling. > > > > Tested myself on i386, amd64, sparc64, sparc, alpha and hppa > > hi, > > i like the diff, but why not get rid of netisr_dispatch.h?
I planned to this after this diff goes in. I did not want to change Owain's initial diff too much so I left that out for now. > also i'm not sure, but maybe netisr.c copyright should be > attributed to berkeley as we're using their code directly? Are we? The current netisr.c code is a generic implementation of using softinterrupts to run the netisr and in the future it will get even more different. Owain, what do you think? -- :wq Claudio
