Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Here's an attempt to fix a potential MCLGETI issue with vr(4) similar
> to what I recently fixed fro re(4).  Unfortunately I don't have any
> vr(4) hardware myself, so I need some hep testing this.
> 
> Things to look for are:
> 
> 1. Does this diff have any effect on throughput (packets/s, bits/s).
> 
> 2. Does this fix any problems with the interface if you blast it with
>    packets?
> 
> 3. Does livelock mitigation actualy work?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark

Hi Mark,

Did you receive any feedback for this? is there an easy way to replicate
the problems others are seeing, as my systems seem stable.

Using this patch doesn't seem to cause any noticeable performance
regressions.

-Bryan.

Reply via email to