On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen <pe...@bsdly.net> wrote: > The IPSEC allegations have produced a flurry of blog posts and > suchlike, mostly just rehashing the contents of Theo's original > message. However, I've found two followups that are interesting for > their own separate reasons: > > in http://blogs.csoonline.com/1296/an_fbi_backdoor_in_openbsd , there > appears to be some additional veribage from Gregory Perry, but IMHO it > does not really add much in the way of useful information. > > The other item, > > http://maycontaintracesofbolts.blogspot.com/2010/12/openbsd-ipsec-backdoor-al legations.html > > is quite a bit more interesting, since it's a public challenge (with a > cash bounty) to come up with actual evidence of backdoor code in the > relevant parts of OpenBSD. There have been offers to match original 3 > * USD 100 bounty, so with a little more circulation the bounty could > turn into a good amount.
It is easy to shoot one's mouth off like that about bounty offered, given the ridiculously constrained "conditions" the bounty is offered under. He might as well offered a million USD. No one will be able to prove this under these restrictions. --patrick
